Try. Not. To. Panic. After days of threatening online action, Justin Bieber has officially deactivated his Instagram account. (And just when he got a cute new puppy!)
Over the weekend, the Biebs told his followers that he would set his account to private if they continued to harass his new lady love, Sofia Richie. This prompted both widespread panic in the Belieber community and rather public shade from his exes, Selena Gomez andHailey Baldwin.
Shortly after the "Sorry" singer took down his account entirely, Gomez took to Snapchat to post an apology that appears to be related to the situation.
"What I said was selfish and pointless," she wrote.
It was widely reported that Gomez and Bieber had a heated back and forth in the comments of Instagram about Bieber's threat to make his account private. Though the comments were deleted, fans posted screengrabs.
"If you can't handle the hate then stop posting pictures of your girlfriend lol - it should be special between you two only," Gomez allegedly wrote. "Don't be mad at your fans. They love you."
According to the screengrabs, Bieber replied, "It's funny to see people that used me for attention and still trying to point the finger this way. Sad. All love. I'm not one for anyone receiving hate."
The famous exes then supposedly accused one another of cheating, with the Biebs saying that Gomez cheated with Gigi Hadid's current boyfriend, Zayn Malik.Welcom
Only time will tell if Bieber will return to Instagram, but is it too late now for Gomez to say sorry?
RELATED: Selena Gomez Seemingly Accuses Justin Bieber of Cheating Calls Out His Romance with Sofia Richie

 20: Bringing up the rear for the best-selling mobile phone of all time is the Samsung Galaxy S III. Released in 2012, it shipped with Android 4.04 Ice Cream Sandwich, and is widely hailed as being the first smartphone to kick off Samsung's domination of the market. It has sold more than 60 million units.

 19: The Motorola StarTAC is the oldest phone on the list, released in 1996, and is regarded as one of the first mobiles to truly enter the mainstream conscience, selling more than 60 million.


18: Apple's iPhone 4s, released in 2011, was the first iPhone to feature digital assistant Siri, and has sold more than 60 million units.



 17: In 17th place is the Nokia 5130. Way back in 2007, this music-playing phone sported a 2MP camera and shifted more than 65 million handsets.


 16: The iPhone 5 was Apple's first foray into creating larger handsets, boasting a 4-inch display up from predecessor the 4s' 3.5-inch screen. It was launched in 2012 with a production run of only 12 months. More than 70 million were sold.
15: The solid Nokia 6010 is the 16th entry in the list, clocking up sales of more than 75 million since its introduction in 2004.
 14: Samsung's wildly popular Galaxy S4 went on sale in 2013, and quickly became the company's fastest-selling smartphone. It sold a total of 80 million units before it was replaced by the Galaxy S5 the next year.
 13: Apple's best-selling iPhones to date, the 6 and 6 Plus models were released in 2014, and have sold more than 100 million handsets.
 12: The Nokia 1208 first went on sale in 2007, and featured an inbuilt torch and colour screen with a resolution of 96 x 98 pixels. More than 100 million were sold worldwide.
 11: The legendary and practically indestructable Nokia 3310 came into being back in 2000, and is noted for its great games, including Snake and Space Impact. It sold more than 126 million units.
 10: Motorola's highest entry in the top 20 was for the RAZR V3, which after selling more than 130 million handsets, is also the world's best-selling clamshell phone. It went on sale in 2004.
9: The basic but hardy Nokia 1600 was released in 2006, and has shifted 130 million + units. It was developed specifically for users in emerging markets including India and China.
 8: Another very basic Nokia, the 2600 did not have a camera or Bluetooth connectivity. It was released in 2004 and has sold more than 135 million units.
 7: The tough Samsung E1100 boasted a battery life of around 13 days on standby when it went on sale in 2009, and is 8th in the list, selling more than 150 million units in that time.
 6: The egg-shaped Nokia 6600 was incredibly popular despite its hefty £400 price tag back in 2003, and has clocked up sales of more than 150 million.
5: The Symbian-running Nokia 5230 has sold more than 150 million units despite its lack on Wi-Fi support. It went on sale in 2009.
 4: The Nokia 1200 was praised for its long battery life - more than 390 hours - and featured a fetching green backlight. It has sold more than 150 million units since its introduction in 2007.
 3: The classic Nokia 3210 is the third best-selling phone after generating sales of more than 150 million. It went on sale in 1999, and is fondly remembered as many people's first ever mobile phone.
 2: The low-end Nokia 1110 was released in 2005, and has narrowly been pipped to the post as the world's most popular show. Its inverted screen, featuring white text on a black background, boosted it to sales of more than 250 million.
1: The Nokia 1100 may not be as famous as the 3310, but it's the best-selling mobile phone the world has ever known, shifting more than 250 million. It went on sale in 2003, and has since been sadly discontinued. Nokia's one billionth phone sold was an 1100 in Nigeria in 2005. 

It’s an open secret that the Internet of Things (if we must call it so) is pretty terrible, whether in standards, ineroperability, or security. Good security, though, you don’t really expect in a smart light bulb or coffee maker. A smart front door lock, however, really shouldn’t be quite this easy to hack.
Two different presentations at DEF CON this year made it clear that there’s a long way to go before we should start trusting the average smart lock — or even the nice ones. This may surprise you, or you might have been saying it for years. At all events, these guys proved it with gusto.
Anthony Rose and Ben Ramsey, from Merculite Security, showed off a bit of lock hackingdone with less than $200 worth of off-the-shelf hardware. Some opened easier than others, but in the end 12 out of 16 yielded.
Locks from Quicklock, iBluLock, and Plantraco transmitted their passwords in plaintext, making them vulnerable to anyone with a Bluetooth sniffer. Others were tricked by the attacker simply replaying the same data they snatched out the air when a legit user unlocked the door. Another entered a failstate and opened by default when it received an encrypted string that was off by one byte.
Worth noting as well: doing a bit of wardriving, the two found plenty of locks identifying themselves as such, making it easy for an attacker to find devices to listen in on.
Pretty poor showing altogether, although a few resisted Rose and Ramsey’s attempts: the Noke and Masterlock smart padlocks survived, and a Kwikset Kevo did as well — until they opened it with a screwdriver. Okay, that’s cheating, but the point stands.
Perhaps most worryingly, only one of the 12 vendors the two contacted to inform them of these flaws responded — and even then, there was no plan to fix anything.
One that Merculite failed to crack was the August door lock, a rather more well known brand than the others (MasterLock notwithstanding). Fortunately, someone else had already made it their mission to break the thing wide open.
Jmaxxz’s entertaining, meme-filled presentation puts the lie to many of the claims set forth by August, and although it’s unlikely your average B&E artist is going to bother to circumvent certificate pinning and pawing through your logs, the security holes are real.
Many items that were too hard to get by ordinary hacking means like sniffers… could be found in plaintext in logs and the like. Jmaxxz is one of those hackers that doesn’t like to work any harder than he has to — and why should he?
Inside the August there were good practices and bad — and to the company’s credit, the hacker noted, they have been responsive and many of these holes are likely fixed. Still, it’s hard to believe that guests could ever award themselves extra lock permissions just by changing a string in the API calls from “user” to “superuser”!
For now, it seems, these locks are long on convenience and short on security. If you don’t mind having less-than-stellar security on your pool house or mother-in-law, this could be a nice way to keep your keychain light — but for the front door, you can do better.
Giant flocks of black birds circled the wreckage of an airliner that had struck an Alaska mountain two weeks earlier, killing all 111 aboard. In a small plane overhead, a young engineer directed his pilot to follow the same path the jet had taken toward the craggy terrain.
With seconds to spare, an alarm went off. Don Bateman’s plane climbed to safety, but he was frustrated. The electronic device he invented to warn pilots that they were about to hit the ground didn’t leave enough time to have prevented the large airliner from crashing.
“I was disappointed,” Bateman, now 84, recalled of the day in 1971 when he flew over the remains of Alaska Airlines Flight 1866, which had slammed into a fog-shrouded ridge. “We needed to do better.”
That’s exactly what Bateman and his small team of engineers at what is now Honeywell International Inc. did. The device presaged today’s mobile mapping applications, dramatically reduced what had been by far the worst class of air crashes and made Honeywell billions of dollars.
“I would give Don individual credit for having saved more lives than any other individual in the history of commercial aviation,” said Earl Weener, a member of the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board and former chief engineer for safety at Boeing Co.
Before retiring in June, Bateman and his band of colleagues dabbled in the world of Cold War espionage, hid the true cost of their endeavor from their corporate masters and endured skepticism from the very airlines whose planes were being lost. In spite of repeated changes in corporate ownership and the blunt-spoken Bateman’s occasional threats to quit, he worked on his mission to save lives with the same group for almost six decades, colleagues said.
Eventually Bateman’s Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System became required in most commercial planes around the world, dramatically reducing accidents in which perfectly good aircraft with trained crews plowed into the ground or bodies of water, almost always in poor visibility.
In the 1960s and 1970s, there was an average of one such fatal accident per month, according to the AviationSafetyNetwork website. It was by far the largest cause of death in jetliner accidents.
Related video: Lessons from pilot who landed one of most damaged planes in history
Since the U.S. government began requiring an upgraded version of the device on all but the smallest aircraft starting in 2001, there hasn’t been a single such fatal crash on a U.S. commercial passenger plane equipped with it or competing devices. There have been a few overseas, often when pilots ignored or shut off the devices.
President Barack Obama awarded Bateman the National Medal of Technology and Innovation in 2011.
Bateman was always fascinated with airplane crashes. As an 8-year-old school boy in 1940 in Saskatoon, Canada, he and a friend sneaked out of class after two military planes collided and crashed nearby. As punishment, his teacher made him write a report on what happened.
“That was my introduction to aircraft accidents,” he said recently. The carnage he saw that day helped motivate him years later.
After taking a job with Boeing in Seattle, he joined a small aviation firm called United Control in 1958. Airplane accidents continued to fascinate him and he began “making little books” of notes on them. One type stood out.
In the arcane world of aviation terminology, these crashes were called Controlled Flight into Terrain, or CFIT. It was a vexing problem: Basic navigation should have kept pilots from crashing. But the cockpit navigation technology of that era wasn’t intuitive and it was too easy to get disoriented, especially at night or in bad weather.
“In my mind it became a big issue, even though there wasn’t much being done about it,” Bateman recalled.
In the 1960s, Bateman worked with Scandinavian Airlines System, now SAS AB, which had suffered a CFIT crash in Turkey in 1960, to invent a mechanism to warn pilots when they flew too low. It involved a new instrument on planes that used radio waves to determine a plane’s distance from the ground. It helped stem the accident rate and, after a series of crashes, the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration required it starting in 1974.
But it was prone to false alarms and had a glaring weakness: It couldn’t look forward, so was of little use if a plane was flying toward steeply increasing ground, such as a mountain.
For years, Bateman tinkered with the device to improve it. He also consulted with NTSB investigators, poring over accident reports.
“He would come to me and say what do we know about this accident?” said Jim Ritter, director of the NTSB’s Office of Research and Engineering, who was a technician at the time. “The whole time, the gears were spinning and he was trying to make things safer.”
Bateman had been imagining a far better solution as early as his flight over the Alaska crash site. If he could create a database of all the world’s terrain, the device would see mountain tops and cliffs from miles away. But this was before personal computers and global-positioning services.
Even worse, much of the world’s topography was considered secret at the time, a vestige of the Cold War.
Then in 1991, in the chaos created by the breakup of the Soviet Union, the detailed maps it had created of the world starting in the 1920s were for sale -- if you knew where to buy them.
Bateman asked Frank Daly, the director of engineering at the Sundstrand Corp. division that had swallowed United Control, for his blessing to purchase the data from the U.S. government’s Cold War enemy.
“He thought I was crazy,” Bateman said.
They wound up sending one of his employees, Frank Brem, in search of maps in Russia and elsewhere. “There isn’t a terrain data store in downtown Moscow,” Daly recalled. “But he would go out and find the right people.”
A bigger problem than navigating the black market was the millions of dollars it was costing for the still unproven technology. “We probably weren’t as open with senior management about that process,” Daly said. He sometimes hid costs in other accounts.
By the early 1990s, Bateman had developed working prototypes of the new system. Now the company had to sell it.
For pilots and safety officers, it was a marvel. Ed Soliday, then director of safety at United Airlines, had been prodding Bateman to improve the warning device. One day in the early 1990s, Bateman called and said he thought he had what Soliday wanted.
“Once I flew the thing with Don, it was like an epiphany,” Soliday recalled. “I was sold. I thought if we could make it work, this was a huge breakthrough.”
If a plane was flying toward a mountain, a screen popped up automatically marking the high ground in yellow and red on a map. If pilots didn’t respond, it began a series of increasingly dire warnings. Once a collision became almost imminent, a mechanical voice implored, “Terrain, terrain. Pull up! Pull up!” Compared to the earlier system, it was almost fool proof.
But many of the more cost-conscious corporate chieftains at airlines weren’t convinced, according to Bateman and Daly.
A meeting at American Airlines was particularly grim. Daly was on the sales call at the airline’s headquarters with his then chief executive officer. Their host, a senior executive at the airline, was hostile.
“He was almost apoplectic and said, ‘We don’t want another box. We don’t want to have to replace the existing system,’ ” Daly said. “Here I am justifying spending tens or hundreds of millions of dollars and my boss has just been soundly beaten on the shoulders by the customer.”
Soliday had more success at United. The airline agreed to help Bateman’s team test it so it could be certified by the FAA, he said. Most other carriers balked. It took another high-profile fatal crash to change their minds.
As American Flight 965 neared Cali, Colombia, from Miami on the evening of Dec. 20, 1995, a pilot accidentally entered the wrong data into the plane’s flight computers. The crew didn’t notice as it began a slow left turn toward mountains lying invisible in the darkness.
The Boeing 757 was equipped with the earlier version of Bateman’s warning device and its mechanical voice began warning of “terrain.” But 13 seconds later, after the pilots added full throttle to climb as steeply as possible, it rammed into a ridge. All but four of the 163 people aboard died.
Within days the airline wanted the new device, which would have issued an alert far earlier and likely prevented the crash, Bateman and Daly said. First American and then United agreed to voluntarily install them. Other carriers followed. The FAA began requiring them in 2001.
In the end, the products spawned by Bateman’s device were a financial boon to Honeywell. There are 45,000 units on aircraft today, worth more than $4 billion at list prices, according to the company.
Both Bateman and Daly wonder whether the decades-long effort to develop and improve the warning system would be possible in today’s risk-averse corporate world.
“Today new projects need to be blessed by many people,” Daly said. “You need to have hard evidence. They just would not speculatively fund something like this, especially when we were being resisted by the aircraft manufacturers, the airlines.
“But Don’s faith, the genius of his team and a little support from the company -- and it 
Tom Cruisehas not seen with his daughter Suri in three years, Gossip Cop can confirm. In fact, we have been consistently right about their relationship over the years while tabloids have wrongly reported about made-up father-daughter reunions. That’s why we would like to congratulate OK! for finally getting it mostly right this week.
On the cover on its new magazine is a photo of Katie Holmesand Suri with the headline, “Their Life Without Tom.” Inside its pages are some accurate points, and a few completely off-base statements. Let’s not forget, this is the same tabloid Gossip Cop has repeatedly corrected for its untrue narratives about Holmes and Jamie Foxx. A little more than two months ago, we busted the publication when it ran an inaccurate cover story that alleged apregnant Holmes called off her wedding to Foxx.
None of that was true. Nor was the March cover that falsely claimed Holmes and Foxx were having a baby girl together, or a January cover that wrongly blared, “Wedding & A Baby” for Holmes and Foxx. Curiously, just about one year ago to the date, it was actually OK! that mistakenly reported Cruise had a secret “meeting” with Suri for three hours in an apartment belonging to “someone in his management team,” where he gave his daughter “a big teddy bear as the two embraced and then played hide-and-seek and read stories.” As Gossip Copexclusively noted then, that get-together never, ever happened.
The magazine’s story this week, however, has some more accurate reporting. Most notably, it’s right about Cruise not having seen Suri in years.
Allow Gossip Cop to separate what’s fact and what’s fiction. Not only hasn’t Cruise seen Suri in three-plus years, but we can exclusively report he has not even contacted his daughter in that time. According to one of our sources, “There’s been no communication at all.” 
We're sorry, this video cannot be played from your current location.
Gossip Cop was told there were times when the actor, who can jet anywhere he wants, was just a few states away from Suri and never tried to see her, let alone contact her. When other tabloids, such as In Touch, published a number of erroneous articles in the past about Cruise seeking custody of Suri, an insider expressed to Gossip Cop, “It’s crazy people are focusing on [Cruise] looking for more custody when he hasn’t even attempted to contact [his daughter] in years.”
In January, for example, Gossip Cop debunked an absurd cover story from that publication which alleged the Mission: Impossible star had “ruined” Holmes’ wedding plans with Foxx because there was the specter of Cruise attempting to “get more custodyand try[ing] to sway Suri over to Scientology.” In addition to the falsity of In Touch’s assertion that Foxx and Holmes were planning a “secret wedding,” an impeccable source revealed to Gossip Cop back then, “Trying to get custody? How about seeing [Suri] first?”
Should Cruise reestablish contact with Suri, Gossip Cop will happily report on it. We reached out to reps for both Cruise and Holmes and neither has responded to our investigation.
The credibility of Olympic swimming, already suffering from spats and doping scandals, has been further damaged by serious discrepancies in the entry times of a number of competitors.
The Olympic entry lists show many of the swimmers competing in Rio achieved their entry times at the World Aquatics Championships in Kazan in August 2015. In nine cases the entry times listed do not match the times recorded at those championships. Another eight are listed as having achieved entry times in events in which they did not compete or were disqualified from. The 17 athletes are from 16 different countries, and include 11 men and six women.
Fina, the sport’s governing body, said the mistakes were made by the Rio Organising Committee when they were compiling the entry lists. The organising committee, although it declined to make a comment, said ultimate responsibility lies with Fina, whose technical committee, according to the ROC, signed off on all times at a meeting last week. Neither body feels the credibility of the event has been affected.
All of the swimmers in question were selected under Fina’s “universality rule”that allows countries where no swimmer has achieved the qualifying standard to nominate one man and one woman to compete at the Olympics. There are 220 universality swimmers in Rio. Fina said it had already identified and corrected as many as 40 similar mistakes but they missed these 17.
Last August, the Mexican swimming federation admitted it had faked many of its squad’s entry times for those same championships in Kazan.
According to reports, Fina’s executive director, Cornel Marculescu, said there would be no punishment for the Mexican federation as entry times were used only to put swimmers in lanes and no Mexicans advanced to the semi-finals or finals. It was, however, later suspended from Fina and fined after it pulled out of hosting the 2017 world championships.
John Leonard, the executive director of the World Swimming Coaches Association, said: “Fina clearly does not care about veracity in entry times to its events as it allowed the Mexican delegation to submit false entry times to the world championships with no penalty.”
The president of the WSCA, George Block, described the discrepancies as “alarming” and said the universality rule was “something coaches have been concerned about for quite a few years”. Last week the Guardian reported on the case of the Kenya swimmer Issa Mohamed. He was not selected for Rio even though he had more Fina ranking points than any other Kenyan male. Mohamed took his case to the sports disputes tribunal in Kenya.According to reports the federation “was punished for operating on unclear grounds” but the tribunal felt unable to overturn the selection, so Mohamed is not in Rio.
Kenya picked Hamdan Bayusuf. He is one of the 17 swimmers whose entry time for Rio has changed. Bayusuf’s time for the 100m backstroke was listed as 59.99sec, achieved in the first heat in Kazan on 3 August, 2015. The results sheet from that race shows his time was 1min 07sec. A Fina representative showed the Guardian the original nomination forms that listed Mohamed’s qualifying time as 1min 07sec. The representative said Fina had no idea how the wrong time of 59.99sec appeared on the entry list. There was a suggestion five of the 17 times were too slow for the organising committee’s computer system to process. There is no suggestion of wrongdoing, or knowledge of the changed times, on the part of Bayusuf or any of the other swimmers in Rio.
Several leading US officials have encouraged Fina to use a fully automated system to calculate the entries and heat seedings for the Olympics. Fina prefers to process the hundreds of applications by hand. Fina was not willing to comment but recently released a statement saying it had commissioned an independent report “aimed at guaranteeing and ensuring that good governance principles are properly implemented by Fina in an ever-changing modern sport environment.”
b:include data='blog' name='google-analytics'/>